Skip to content
Naked Security Naked Security

News in brief: cars confused by kangaroos; fears on airport books move; Google hit with €2.42bn fine

Your daily round-up of some of the other stories in the news

Your daily round-up of some of the other stories in the news

Driverless cars baffled by roos

It’s been a bit of a bumpy road for driverless cars, what with fatal crashes, falling foul of regulators in San Francisco and more crashes, but Swedish carmaker Volvo seems to have run into a unique problem in Australia: their driverless cars are struggling to recognise kangaroos.

The BBC reported on Tuesday that the S90 and XC90 models, which use the carmaker’s Large Animal Detection System to scan the road for big beasts such as elk and caribou, aren’t coping well with the much faster-moving marsupials.

David Pickett of Volvo told Australia’s ABC: “We’ve noticed with the kangaroo being in mid-flight … when it’s in the air it actually looks  like it’s further away, then it lands and looks closer.”

Added Pickett: “First, we have to start identifying the roo. We identify what a human looks like by how a human walks, because it’s not only the one type of human – you’ve got short people, tall people, people wearing coats. The same applies to a roo.”

We’ve never seen a kangaroo wearing a coat, but we hope Volvo’s cars learn to recognise the roos soon.

Privacy fears over airport screening of books

Planning on taking old-fashioned books in your carry-on if you’re flying to the US from a country or on an airline affected by the laptop ban, which includes Kindles? The US Transport Safety Administration (TSA) has been trialling a scheme removing books from carry-on bags as passengers go through airport security.

The Hill reported at the weekend that the TSA had run tests at airports in California and Missouri when passengers had been asked to remove books and magazines from their luggage and examined separately. The fear is, apparently, that books can be hollowed out to hide contraband – drugs and explosives.

The ACLU expressed concern about the move by the TSA, saying: “Books raise very special privacy issues … there is a long history of special legal protection for the privacy of one’s reading habits in the United States. We know that in the airline screening environment, there have been multiple cases where passengers have been singled out because of their First Amendment-protected expressions.”

The ACLU added: “To at least one woman who experienced the new policy, ‘The scrutiny of my books, magazines and foods feels even more invasive’ than body scanners, swabs and pat-downs.”

It’s not clear if this is going to be rolled out more widely: The Hill and Time reported that plans had been shelved, but the ACLU referred to an earlier interview with John Kelly, the homeland security secretary, who said “we might, and likely will” apply the policy nationwide.

Google fined for breaking antitrust laws

Google has been fined €2.42bn for abusing its power by promoting its own shopping comparison service at the top of its search results.

The fine was levied by the European Commission, which had accused the search giant of distorting the market and giving “illegal advantage” by promoting its comparison service, in breach of EU antitrust rules.

Google, which has 90 days to comply or risks further fines of 5% of the average daily turnover of Alphabet, its parent company, said: “We respectfully disagree with the conclusions announced today”, and added that it would “review the Commission’s decision in detail as we consider an appeal.”

Competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager said: “Google has come up with many innovative products and services that have made a difference to our lives. That’s a good thing … But what Google has done is illegal under EU antitrust rules. It denied other companies the chance to compete on the merits and to innovate. and most importantly, it denied European consumers a genuine choice of services and the full benefits of innovation.”

Catch up with all of today’s stories on Naked Security


Google should tell the EU to get lost. Don’t pay that joke of a fine. They’re always trying to make American companies pay huge fines. A bunch of nonsense.


You wanna do business in the EU, you gotta stick to the rules.
Just like European companies have to stick to the rules if the want to do business in the States.
It’s not like, hey, we’re this big ‘murrican company, we can do whatever the hell we fancy and you forriners just have to put up with it.


It really is getting ridiculous, the cat-and-mouse of TSA vs. security threats of the what-won’t-they-think-of-next variety.
That said, ‘The scrutiny of my books, magazines and foods feels even more invasive’ than body scanners, swabs and pat-downs.
Ummm not sure what books she’s got on the plane; maybe that’s something to decide before leaving the house. Call me overprotective of my personal space, but I’d rather hand a stranger my copy of Newsweek than have him rub me all over looking for protrusions. I’ll leave Mitnick’s “The Art of Intrusion” at home.


I don’t like being searched or having my stuff gone through in public, especially in respect of tthings like medicines – what great details for a social engineer looking over my shoulder! So I usually ask to have my stuff searched privately, either officially (e.g. in a designated searching room) or unofficially (e.g. off to one side where fellow travellers can’t easily rubberneck). The only countries in my experience that haven’t batted an eyelid at my requests are NZ and the USA – always shrug and say, “OK.” TSA usually ask how long until my flight, to warn me I might have to wait a while, because they need two people to do a private search, for obvious reasons to do with lawyers. So I go through nice and early, happy to wait.

In both the UK and Oz I have had real hassles doing that – the private companies hired to do “security” have frequently complained at me, saying, “Look at the queue, you’ll hold everyone up, why can’t you be like everyone else, why be so precious about your sponge bag?” When I say I deliberately arrived early and have time to wait for them, they usually thaw somewhat, but the attitude often seems to be that the more willing I am to let them to search me properly and to avoid a rush, the more they seem to think that I am getting in the way.

You can please some of the people some of the time :-)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to get the latest updates in your inbox.
Which categories are you interested in?
You’re now subscribed!