Skip to content

17 Comments

I’m firmly in the “puhlease” camp. It is unfortunate that police in all countries develop a barracks mentality, where they feel everyone is against them and the answer us to lash out. (And yes, after many years in the military I do know what a barracks mentality is – I had it once)

In this instance they should discover a sense of humour. If they had half a brain they would invite “the criminal” to add a humourous column to their own efforts

Reply

Why do the police need a Facebook page anyway? If you run an official organisation, you run an official web site over which you have complete control and are responsible for security. A Facebook page for an organisation is only to make you look in touch and trendy, and is an open invitation to parody if it is on a site that has very little control or security.
Believing things written on Facebook is about on a par with believing things written in the UK tabloid press and the tooth fairy.

Reply

Satire (even bad satire) is protected free speech in the U.S., and it doesn’t sound like any real harm was done. I hope the police come to their senses before they get sued.

Reply

Did you seriously just call a PD Facebook page “an official service that people really do need when things go wrong”?

Reply

I think the official service referred to is the police department itself, and the Facebook page is an effective pointer to it. So misleading people about what that police service is all about is…well, it’s not really terribly clever, is it? A bit like “satirically” messing with the signposts to the next village because you don’t like it. Thin lines between satire | mockery | libel | deception.

Reply

Two thumbs up for the Anonymous comment: “Satire (even bad satire) is protected free speech in the U.S., and it doesn’t sound like any real harm was done.” But there seems little hope that the police will respect that. But if they end up being sued – only the citizens will suffer a loss – not the LEO’s in question.

Reply

This is ridiculous. They need a serious sense of humour bypass as well as a crash course in the Streisand Effect.

Reply

What we don’t know yet is if he responded to direct messages to the page without revealing that he wasn’t actually an official within the Parma PD. If this is the case then that would be firm grounds for the arrest and felony charges. There are a lot of posts we haven’t seen as well. I’m interested in seeing what evidence comes to light during the hearing. I’m on then fence until we know more.

Reply

I have 50-50 feelings on this. YES satire and free speech should be protected, so Mr. Novak does not deserve jail time or a felony charge for this. However we must admit that he walked a fine line, and gambled a bit, by putting the page up and by not making it ABSOLUTELY CLEAR that it was a parody page. If you want to “create art” or “satire” that is fine but he should have made it abundantly clear through the messaging that it was a joke page. A simple disclaimer stating “This page is for entertainment and satirical purposes only, and does not have any affiliation with the real Parma Police Department” plus maybe even a link to the real page, would have helped his cause. I have a problem with people taking a puh-lease approach and getting all Alex Jones-y on government overreach. Grow up people… pranks are ok but if you consider yourself an intelligent, fair-minded person, then realize that the Police are busy and don’t need to be f***ked with for some dumb prank, flying under the banner of pseudo-art. And “art” is a stretch to be perfectly honest with you. (Oh look at you…making fun of police and calling them pigs… how edgy and original). Mr. Novak would be a happier man (and would get more dates) if he opted to pick up a guitar, paintbrush or typewriter and go make some real art. This prank stuff is pedestrian.

Reply

This is an overreach by the Police department. No Facebook page should ever be considered an “Emergency Service”.

It is an alternative communication source, but should not be considered the equivalent of 911

Reply

Hustler Magazine, Inc. et al. v. Jerry Falwell — Nothing more be said. It is constitutionally protected speech. And the law (http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2909.04) doesn’t apply. This was malicious arrest under false pretenses and the EFF should be brought in.

Reply

Free speech is not a defense when it breaks the law. Make no mistake about it – Mr. Novak purposefully misrepresented an official agency, without a clear indication that it was parody/entertainment, and THAT is why the argument is being made that he attempted to disrupt public services. Free Speech does not mean that words are immune to the rule of law. For example Libel is illegal because it is a deliberate misrepresentation of facts, and that is why reporters are culpable in court if they are deliberately printing lies, and can not simply hide behind the banner of free speech. To offer some more clarity, “Free Speech” refers to many things, one of which is the right of the people to speak out and not fear retaliation from the government. (Meaning a stand up comedian won’t get arrested because he made a joke about how stupid President Bush was). It also protects unpopular ideas… so even though it is deplorable, some racist redneck can print all the ignorant racist cartoons that he wants, as long as in doing so, he does not break any laws (like Libel or making death threats). Don’t use Free Speech – one of the most beautiful ideals the world has known – as a cover for purposefully breaking the law (in this case disrupting public services). If Mr. Novak wanted to create “art” (lol) then he needs to do so within the bounds of the law like everybody else. He should have made it VERY CLEAR that the page was a joke, and by the sound of it he did not do that. “Minus the actual content, the facsimile that Novak allegedly put up was very convincing: same font, same coloring, same photo of a Parma badge, same gold seal.” Mr. Novak dug his own grave. He did not make any clear efforts to indicate to the audience that the page was parody/entertainment (other than the frivolous content), and that is where he went wrong.

Reply

What the hell are companies doing on Facebook anyway, it’s social media where only a individual can log in. Therefore police departments or any other kind of company don’t belong there. Facebook sucks big time anyway. That police department should not waste public money.

Reply

Facebook is only for individuals?

Let’s see…well, Facebook has a Facebook page. So does Microsoft, Google, Oracle, Adobe…you’d better let all those companies know they aren’t supposed to be there.

Hmmm. The US Marines (with about 3,000,000 Likes) are on Facebook too. Maybe you should ask *them*, “What the hell are you doing on Facebook?”

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to get the latest updates in your inbox.
Which categories are you interested in?
You’re now subscribed!