Google announced on Tuesday that it’s purchased a smart-glasses company called North and, notwithstanding its failure to bring Google Glass wearables to the masses, still plans to caress our vision with the vast tentacles of its helpfulness.
From the announcement, which was posted by Rick Osterloh, Senior Vice President, Devices & Services:
From 10 blue links on a PC, to Maps on your mobile phone, to Google Nest Hub sharing a recipe in the kitchen, Google has always strived to be helpful to people in their daily lives. We’re building towards a future where helpfulness is all around you, where all your devices just work together and technology fades into the background. We call this ambient computing.
Credit where credit’s due – “ambient computing” sounds friendlier than, say, “pervasive privacy-threatening creepster surveillance spectacles.” Privacy concerns contributed to the sinking of Google Glass. In January 2016, after years of development, Google shuttered its Glass social media accounts.
A year prior, Google had ended its Explorer program and stopped selling Glass. But a few months after that, Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt said that the move wasn’t meant to imply that Google was sticking a fork in its internet-connected eyeglasses.
No, Schmidt said, Google Glass wasn’t dead. It was just being fine-tuned for the masses. Google then focused work on a Glass spinoff for the enterprise.
Details of the North purchase, including how much Google’s paying for the Canadian company, weren’t disclosed.
North was founded in 2012 and has focused on building various iterations of augmented reality (AR) glasses. The company said in an announcement on Tuesday that it will keep supporting its customers through to the end of the year.
That leaves 6 more months for customers to enjoy their Focals by North wearables, which connect with Alexa and which feature a tiny laser in the arm that projects images in front of users’ eyes.
Focals are prescription eyeglasses with a nearly-normal look. Similar to smart watches, they pair to wearers’ phones through Bluetooth in order to display notifications, provide directions, or call an Uber.
Focals are also equipped with a speaker and can chirp notifications at you. All of this means that you can mysteriously know what’s been said in a chat, without taking out your phone, since the messages have been beamed to your eyeballs.
But groovy features like that aren’t what skewered Google Glass. Rather, it was the fact that Google Glass could be used to take photos and videos.
That resulted in fear, loathing and a lot of headlines, and not the kind that PR people like to stick on the company’s website: more along the lines of a fight breaking out in a pub over somebody wearing Glass, multiple eateries telling Glass wearers to please take them off, and at least one of those restaurants getting vilified on Yelp by people who’d never stepped foot inside.
And yes, that contributed to the creation of the sobriquet “Glassholes” to describe those amongst the Glass Explorers whose manners were found wanting.
For its part, North had also planned to incorporate a camera into Focals 2.0. But now that it’s being acquired by Google, that second-generation pair of smart glasses won’t be forthcoming, North said in its acquisition announcement.
Time will tell if the Google version of Focals will be equipped with a camera that might reawaken privacy concerns. But it’s not like we don’t have other “ocular assistants” already: there’s Snapchat’s Spectacles, for example, and Facebook’s Oculus showed in September 2019 how it can blend live mapping with the physical world via digital imaging.
Rumor has it that Apple is also working on AR eyewear, while Samsung showed off the technology at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in January.
Is the world ready for smart glasses?
Are these companies going to be accepted by the masses who so enthusiastically rejected Glass?
Maybe. Maybe those companies don’t have to do anything all that much different than Google did with Glass. Maybe the time has come when people are going to be OK with the technology.
Here’s CCS Insight analyst Leo Gebbie, who’s tried North’s eyewear and suggested to the BBC that, unlike Glass, a Google/North version might come at a sweet spot in wearable computing history:
The original Google Glass became an infamous venture for the company. But arguably the product was simply ahead of its time.
Smart glasses could be a revolutionary item of technology. And many Google services, such as Maps, would dovetail perfectly with the right piece of hardware.
Readers, your thoughts? Are we over our dislike of Glass enough to hang Focals off our noses? Let us know below!
Cassandra
Imagine if every policeman wore a pair and they could have flashed onto their eyes “criminal” or “non criminal”. Could be very frustrating for those policemen who previously relied on “instinct” or a “copper’s nose”.
Mind you it just moves the problem from the front-line to the back office where the “criminal” / “non criminal” decision is made and where the data supporting that judgement is input and stored (hopefully securely).
If police can have them, why not other “security” persons – including the unofficial and unregulated who would of course rely on unofficial and unregulated back-office data?
We’re building towards a future where helpfulness is all around you, where all your devices just work together and technology fades into the background.
Try: “We’re building towards a future where surveillance is all around you, where all our devices just work together and your rights just fade into the background.”
Anonymous
Can’t wait for all the car crashes as people read their texts instead of driving properly.
Winston Smith
It is horribly easy to parady the quote in your article;
From 10 blue links on a PC, to Maps on your mobile phone, to sharing a recipe in the kitchen, Big Brother strives to be helpful to people in their daily lives. Big Brother is building towards a future where helpfulness is all around you, where all your devices just work together and the watchful eye of Big Brother fades into the background. Big Brother extends his love to all.
I seem to recall that the East India Company eventually grew so bg and so powerful that an act of Parliament was passed to end it and bring its activities under government control and so India became part of empire.
Jim Rinker
I am a road bicyclist. Having Glass that connects hands free to apps like Google maps, Stava, and Wahoo is priceless. Additionally, I am 80% blind in the left eye. Having Glass with added cameras would give the wearer a potential 360° view of the road without having to turn your head.
Paul Ducklin
Using your head (literally, I mean, not just figuratively) while cycling in order to make regular rear and side observations can be considered a vital part of urban road safety. When you actually make eye contact with other road users – including other cyclists – then you are doing them a favour by letting them know that you know they are there, which also lets you take up a more assertive road position. Rear observations aren’t just to let you make a consistent assessment of the road picture around you but a surprisingly effective way of communicating with other road users. A tilt of the head to see and be seen can negotiate you a quick-and-slick safe lane change where in an “eyes ahead” riding style – with or without cameras and a head-up display of any quality – you’d be waiting yet.
Bryan
Vast Tentacles of Your Helpfulness
…title of my next album.
Paul Ducklin
Sounds like a Cream song. Or maybe King Crimson.