Don’t want to be auto-dialed by direct-call marketers?
In the UK, it’s simple to opt out: just register your number with the free Telephone Preference Service (TPS). Yep, just register, and there you have it: a nice, quiet phone, free of salespeople calling* at obnoxious hours trying to sell you on lowering your energy bill and …. oh, wait, is that your phone ringing?
Why yes, it was your phone ringing, if you were unfortunate enough to be one of the people who opted out but still received calls between April 2015 and March 2016.
The calls came from Home Logic, a UK firm based in Southampton that offers energy-saving solutions. The company is now £50,000 lighter thanks to a penalty issued by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for making marketing calls to people who had made it clear they didn’t want to be contacted in that way.
It was a tech glitch, Home Logic said. What happened was that it licensed the numbers it used to make marketing calls from third-party providers. It then uploaded that data to an electronic dialer system that screened the numbers against the TPS register. One of the third-party providers left it up to Home Logic UK to ensure that the data supplied was screened against the TPS.
Technical issues knocked the system out for 90 days out of 220 between April 2015 and March 2016. That didn’t slow down Home Logic, though: the unsolicited marketing calls kept right on coming, but with no screening against the TPS register.
In fact, during that time, Home Logic made 1,475,969 unsolicited direct marketing calls to people who’ve hopefully now regrown any hair they tore out. Out of those nearly 1.5m calls, 133 went to TPS subscribers, who complained to the ICO.
Does a £50,000 (USD$64,185) fine sound a little light? Historically, it is.
In May, the company behind 99.5m nuisance calls, Keurboom Communications, was hit with a record fine of £400,000 by the ICO. The ICO said that more than 1,000 people complained about the company’s robocalls.
That’s still shy of the maximum fine – £500,000 – the ICO can impose on data controllers for violating regulation 21 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR).
The £50,000 Home Logic fine also pales in comparison to the total fin £750,000 fine Ofcom, the UK’s telecoms regulator, lobbed at TalkTalk in 2013 for abandoned and silent calls to potential customers. That’s the type of nuisance call where automated dialing systems, used in call centers to generate and attempt to connect calls, greet people with silence if there aren’t enough agents to handle all the successfully connected calls.
Still and all, £50,000 is a lot more money than the £2,640 companies are charged for a year-long subscription to the TPS, the ICO noted.
*In truth, you have to take the TPS with a grain of salt: a few years back, in meetings with undercover reporters for the Daily Mail, data bosses admitted to ignoring the no-call list.
The same goes for the US: being on the “Do Not Call” list doesn’t necessarily stop the scammers or fraudsters. In fact, robocalls are on the rise: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) received nearly 3.5m robocall complaints in fiscal year 2016, up 60% from the year before.
CNBC quotes Alex Quilici, CEO of YouMail:
The ‘Do Not Call’ registry actually works for legitimate businesses. The problem is all the people who don’t respect it, who are the scammers who [couldn’t] care less.
Wilderness
Teach ’em a lesson!
Laurence Marks
The big problem here in the US is VoIP callers with User-supplied Caller ID (CLID) number. The voice-spammers can put any phone number they want in the connection packet. Some put invalid numbers. Some put numbers with the same Area Code and Exchange (first six digits of a US call) so you think it’s a neighbor calling you.
Your home telephone provider can tell if it’s a user-supplied number–there’s a bit in the VoIP Call Setup packet per ITU-T specification Q.931 which indicates whether the Calling Party ID is user-supplied or carrier supplied. In other words, AT&T or Comcast or Google could block the calls with spoofed Calling Party ID, but they don’t want to lose the revenue or block legitimate VoIP calls.
0Laf
They are doing that in the UK now as well.
Max
How about a 50k fine for every single person they called that was on the no-call list? Even if it’s just for those that complained, I figure that would actually change their attitude pretty quickly and might make “data bosses” stop ignoring the list.
Kurt S
The problem is exactly as stated in the article: the fraudsters and scammers don’t care. And Laurance Marks clearly identified the fact that the phone company providers don’t want to lose the revenue from the VIOP calls.
My solution is that if I don’t recognize the caller’s TFN, I’ll let it go to VM or let one of the blocking apps on my phone send them into the Bozo bin. Complaining to the DNC Registry or your state AG is pretty much useless since they can’t or won’t try to trace the callers.
Lar
The do not call registry is a joke. I signed up in 2006, and continue receiving phishing, scam, spam calls. I do not answer any call, unless they leave a voice mail. Then depending on circumstances, I may call back. 99% of the calls received, I check in Google search, and end up blocking them. They find ways around blocking too. Bleh!!!
Beatty
The telcos should realise that unsolicited calls (particularly from abroad, particularly those that put a call-back on your line so it rings as soon as you complete your next call) mean that we are ceasing to use our landlines – which must be damaging their business.
As soon as I can disconnect needing a land-line with getting decent broadband (required in most parts of UK), I’m off! meanwhile my call-blocker has more and more rules built into it!