Skip to content
Naked Security Naked Security

Twitter pops a lot of famous people’s follower bubbles

It wiped out accounts locked due to misbehavior, obliterating about 4 followers for non-famous mortals and millions for the glitterati.

Twitter has wiped out accounts that have been locked due to misbehavior, obliterating an average of about four followers each for us earth-bound mortals and millions for its twinkliest stars.
Vijaya Gadde, head of the company’s legal team, said that the move was taken as part of Twitter’s “ongoing and global effort to build trust and encourage healthy conversation on Twitter.”
In other words, it’s another salvo in the fight against fake news – or in the fight against the type of accounts that most Twitter users hold their noses over when they enter a conversation.
The locked-account purge had its biggest impact on the top Twitter accounts, of course.
The more followers, the bigger the gouge: Gadde said that most accounts would lose four or fewer followers, while the more popular accounts would “experience a more significant drop”.
Musician Katy Perry tops Twitter’s list of 50 most-followed accounts. Perry – along with Lady Gaga, who’s at No. 6 – both lost about 2.5m followers, according to the BBC. Ex-President Barack Obama, at No. 3, lost 2.1m followers.
But the biggest hit was to Twitter itself: according to the BBC, Twitter (No. 16 on the list) lost 7.7m followers.

How does an account get locked?

Gadde said that accounts have been locked over the years when they suddenly start acting differently. Twitter will first reach out to the account owners. Unless they validate the account and reset their passwords, Twitter locks them so nobody can log in.
For the most part, these accounts are created by real people, not by spammers. Twitter says it can tell because spam accounts – also referred to as bots – act spammy from the get-go. They’re “increasingly predictable” by Twitter’s system, she said, and can be automatically shut down.
Twitter’s purge affects only follower counts, not tweets, likes or retweets, Gadde said. That makes sense: locked accounts can’t tweet, like or retweet anything. Nor are they served ads. This particular, follower-focused move was taken because follower lists are “one of the most visible features on our service and often associated with account credibility,” she said.
The locked-account crackdown will also not affect users’ Monthly Active User (MAU) or Daily Active User (DAU) metrics. Those metrics don’t include locked accounts that haven’t reset their passwords in more than a month. However, some of the removed locked accounts do have the potential to affect publicly reported metrics, Gadde said.
This is just the latest step Twitter’s taking to improve itself and ensure that “everyone can have confidence in their followers,” Gadde said.
Fake accounts have seriously eroded that confidence. One recent example was the flawed comment process for net neutrality, in which 2m stolen identities were used to make fake comments …including two identities stolen from senators.
In December, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman called the process “deeply corrupted.” In January, he said that the state had launched an investigation into a company that allegedly sold millions of fake followers to social media users.
Here’s hoping the locked-account purge makes such a scenario much less likely to happen again in the future.


Lisa, Vijaya Gadde lied – which is not surprising because @Jack & Twitter is as good at lying as Zuckbooger is. @Jack already blew Gabbe’s cover by admitting they were going after accounts with no avatar and accounts that appeared inactive for a while.
That’s a far cry from “accounts that have been locked due to misbehavior”. @Jack actually suggested that anyone without an avatar is suspicious, which is a farce. In most cases it’s a timid person or someone with poor computer skills.
So in closing I’ll pass on a tidbit just for you lovely lady: “How do you know when @Jack or his legal team is lying? When their keystrokes are moving, of course.


Are those two statements mutually exclusive? I mean they could have gone after accounts that had been locked and therefor inactive for a while, i.e. not doing anything to get unlocked again? The avatar one is very strange though.


MacGyver, I hate to burst your bubble, but I just tested your theory. I hate “social media”, and I think Twitter is pretty much a useless platform. I have an account because I needed it for work for one project about 2, 2 1/2 years ago, but my password has been in my password manager since then. I just logged in after over two years of inactivity, and it isn’t locked.


s31064, I didn’t use the “locked” dialog, Max did. Accounts are locked due to suspected activity or being conservative. What miffed me was I read a statement where Jack said he was deleting “unused accounts” – namely ones HE deems as inactive. That is wrong on many levels – people usually expect to return to those accounts. When the account is deleted their follower friends are deleted too. One can open a new account, but it’s worthless without tour follower list


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to get the latest updates in your inbox.
Which categories are you interested in?
You’re now subscribed!