Skip to content
Shocked cat
Naked Security Naked Security

What Facebook plans to do next will SHOCK you!!!

It's giving clickbait headlines the boot

Please, please, Facebook, don’t kill clickbait headlines before I’ve had a chance to find out what she saw when she looked under the cushions and caused the headline writer to be SHOCKED!!!

Listen to reason, for mercy’s sake: I don’t even know what happened after he put garlic in his shoes before going to bed, but I’ve been told by another headline that it’s hard to believe.

Oh, excuse me, I meant It’s HARD to BELIEVE!!!!

Those are just a few of the suck-you-in clickbait headlines that Facebook said it’s working to crush with its mighty algorithmic muscles into a pile of exclamation marks and full caps.

Or, in less clickbaity breathlessness, that type of hyperbole and unfulfilled headline come-on is what Facebook’s trying to reduce, it said in a post put up on Thursday.

(Purportedly) shilling for the left wing and selling advertising like mad might seem to be the main propellers of News Feed, but the Book of Face says that it’s really about relevancy:

One of our News Feed values is to have authentic communication on our platform. People have told us they like seeing authentic stories the most. That’s why we work hard to understand what type of stories and posts people consider genuine, so we can show more of them in News Feed. We also work to understand what kinds of stories people find misleading and spammy to help make sure people see those less.

That means weeding out headlines or link titles that intentionally leave out crucial information or that mislead people, forcing them to click to find out the answer.

Psychologists call them “curiosity-gap headlines.”

Sometimes the media criticizes them for being repetitive and manipulative: Reuters blogger Felix Salmon called them “annoying” and compared them to German sentences in that “you don’t know what they mean until you get to the end.” …

…and then sometimes the media creates listicles of how to write exactly that type of Upworthy-esque, irresistible headline.

(Delicious irony: on top of the Reuters “clickbait headlines are annoying” blog post is a rotating list of headlines, including this one: “Do Not Buy Bitcoin; The smartest bitcoin investors are putting their money here instead.”)

Facebook is planning to cut down on clickbait headlines in News Feed in the coming weeks by tweaking its algorithm.

This is its latest attempt to refine work it’s done before. Two years ago, it surveyed users about what type of content they wanted to see in their News Feeds, and 80% responded that they’d prefer headlines that actually help them figure out if they want to read a full article before clicking through and potentially wasting their time on drivel.

One of the updates it made in 2014 took into account how long people spend reading an article away from Facebook. If it’s a decent amount of time, you can surmise that it’s a valuable article. A click-through followed in short order by a quick about-face back to Facebook means the article was likely gunk.

Another factor is the ratio of how many people click on the content compared with actually discussing and sharing it with friends. A lot of click-through, combined with a dearth of Likes or comments, again means that the content wasn’t worth much.

Two years later, Facebook’s revisiting the clickbait battle. This time, it’s using a system that identifies phrases commonly used in clickbait headlines.

The criteria used to categorize tens of thousands of headlines as clickbait:

  1. Does it withhold information required to understand what the content of the article is? And
  2. Does the headline exaggerate the article to create misleading expectations for the reader?

Facebook gives this example for withheld information necessary to understand what the article will be about: “You’ll Never Believe Who Tripped and Fell on the Red Carpet…” (What happened? Who tripped?)

While this headline: “Apples Are Actually Bad For You?!” misleads the reader, Facebook says: as it is, apples are only bad for you if you eat too many every day, or if you’re eating a low-carbohydrate diet for diabetes or other health reasons.

Facebook had a team review thousands of headlines using those criteria, validating each other’s work to identify a large set of clickbait headlines.

Then, it set up filters for phrases commonly used in clickbait headlines, similar to how many email spam filters work.

The system identifies clickbait posts and what web domains and pages are responsible for them and will then post those pages or domains lower in News Feed, learning over time. Pushing the pages and domains into the basement isn’t a death sentence: they can come back out if they stop their clickbaiting.

Just bear in mind that if you really do value seeing the deliveryman’s priceless reaction when the dog barked, you’d best like it and share it.

If you don’t—and I suspect that those of our readers who are on Facebook tend to fall into this category—don’t click on the clickbait, don’t like it, and don’t share it.

You’ll be helping Facebook’s new algorithms learn, and to slide the bolt to the basement, all that much faster.


Sometimes it doesn’t need to be quite so much bait to be totally irrelevant or annoying. Yahoo news is a classic for pointless news with sensational headlines. As a made up example of the type I mean (I’m sure we’ve all seen them) it’s like seeing a headline like ‘Miley she pregnant???’ I don’t know, lets read the article. You read and it starts is she, isn’t she and by the end it says something like her doctor stated she had a little tummy ache which is common in girls her age. The story may not be untrue, but it’s garbage that’s not even newsworthy. Yahoo is the worst, but there’s many ‘News’ sites out there full of utterly pointless stories which may be true, but are of no news value whatsoever. They just make them appear they are with vague sensationalism. Like the example ‘is she pregnant’ clearly not, they don’t even need to write a story as there isn’t one and they already know that, but they still ask if she is or not and then have nothing but pointless filler to shove in the worthless story.


I do wonder how they are going to detect the negative “withhold information required to understand what the content of the article is”.


Why not crowdsource this or have some FB users that are paid a small amount to vet the links? There should be a button for “clickbait” and if enough of the sensors click it, it will not be shown to other people and would not be allowed to be shared, etc.


I volunteer, but the pay would not be a “small” amount. Yahoo Mail throwing up garbage videos when I empty the trashcan is aggravating and a bandwidth-waster at best and an insult to my intelligence to assume I’d be interested in anything that’s “trending.”


gr8 b8 m8

Seriously though, this bit of news is refreshing in a world constantly demanding my attention (mostly so it can advertise to me). If Facebook can deliver content that is relevant to me and more than “mildly interesting”, maybe it’ll be worth spending time on. Hope this isn’t another empty promise, as so many things on the internet turn out to be.


Good. Lets hope they also do something about those awful sites that require you to click 15 times or more because each page is one sentence or two.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to get the latest updates in your inbox.
Which categories are you interested in?
You’re now subscribed!