There’s a new drone killer in town: a gadget that looks like the offspring of a futuristic laser rifle that fell in love with a TV antenna from the 1960s.
It works by firing radio frequency hacks that screw with drone commands.
As Ars Technica reported from last week’s Navy League Sea Air Space Exposition in Baltimore, the system, which sparked the most buzz at the expo, is called DroneDefender.
It was developed by researchers at Battelle, a nonprofit research and development outfit.
The gadget, powered by a battery in a backpack, has two triggers that allow operators to choose how they want to take down a drone: by remote control disruption of command-and-control signals sent by the operator of a drone trespassing in restricted airspace, or by disrupting its automatic guidance system.
We’ve already seen plenty of anti-drone technologies trialed, be it through official R&D channels or by unsanctioned, low-tech means: as in, “Drone’s over the backyard, best go get the shotgun.”
The more official, less birdshottish anti-drone suggestions have included geofencing, sound-blasting drones out of the sky, a NoFlyZone, and mutant ninja killer raptors.
Kidding. They’re not mutant. They are pretty damn ninja, though.
But many of those anti-drone technologies are dangerous.
While it’s easy enough to jam a drone’s radio to force it to autoland or even try catching it in a net shot out by a bigger drone, some drone interception techniques present the danger of having the gadget turn into a meteor as it loses control and plummets toward the ground – and possibly toward people below.
As you can see in Battelle’s video of a simulated DroneDefender takedown of a drone (it’s been successfully demonstrated in the field), DroneDefender doesn’t turn its prey into a plummeting chunk of plastic and metal.
Rather, it captures an errant drone with what looks like The Force (as in, Luke, use the) and allows the DroneDefender user to ever so gently lower it to the ground by slowly lowering the shotgun-like device to guide the drone as it lands.
Another anti-drone tool demonstrated at the show was Dronebuster, which uses broadband jamming, making it illegal to use in the US.
But its maker, Flex Force, is working on a new version that would pass muster with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations.
According to Ars, rather than jamming command and control signals, the upcoming version of Dronebuster would instead exploit weaknesses in drone communications protocols themselves.
That will enable the Dronebuster’s operator to trigger the “fly home” command on some drones and the “land” command on others, according to Ars’s Sean Gallagher – a feat it accomplishes by cycling through command sets for various drone systems.
Federal government customers are already using a version of Dronebuster.
When will we get a chance to get our hands on one? First, it has to get FCC approval. Then, local agencies could get their hands on it. Then, maybe, other customers.
Lyzak
Sounds a lot like a key fob device you can purchase that emits all the TV vendor codes for “Off”. It’s a universal off control, used primarily as a prank device at bars or in TV retail stores.
Same idea, new twist. Very inventive for non-encrypted and uniquely coded devices.
ejhonda
It’s probably on sale right now from China.
KEN
what range restrictions are on these things? What if some bozo played with one at an airport? And once something is made some one can make it better and stronger for malicious intent.
DroneMann
Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment, including devices that interfere with cellular and Personal Communication Services (PCS), police radar, Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and wireless networking services (Wi-Fi).
18 U.S.C. § 1362 – prohibits willful or malicious interference to US government communications, including GPS signals.
18 U.S.C. § 1367(a) – prohibits intentional or malicious interference to satellite communications, including GPS.
47 U.S.C. § 333 – “No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this Act or operated by the United States Government.”
The FCC is serious. Here’s some recent FCC press releases:
FCC Fines Smart City $750K for Blocking User WiFi at Conventions
FCC proposes $48k fine for Florida man who jammed cellphone calls during daily commute.
FCC Hits Chinese Company with Record Fine for Selling Signal Jammers
Mike Blanchard
this is NOT a jammer… it is 100% legal according to the FCC
gregpbarth@gmail.com
Cant wait to get my hands on one of these and start taking down drones at will. I’m excited just thinking about how angry people like you will be.
Chris
Since the FAA has taken drones under their wing and ruled that drones are aircraft this would be interfering with the operation of an aircraft. Which is a crime. If you cause it damage an unkind officer could charge you with Destruction of Aircraft. Even if you don’t get charged with something federal, but do destroy it, that would be criminal damage. You probably think that is overstated, but then you probably think there’s no harm aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft either and people are currently in prison for that.
SkiPresto
Drone killer. How does it avoid unintended consequences?
Like: Commanding a target drone to go home. But the route home is into the path of an aircraft landing or taking off or in a holding pattern.
Or the commands directly interfere with aircraft systems.
No. It needs to be a drone on drone capture with a direct attack at close range. Obviously, if shooting it down in the wrong place would do more damage than good then wait.
skipresto
Fire a net over the target drone. Then deploy a parachute from the net.
Capture the drone.
Sell it on ebay.
Will
Anything exploiting a weakness in the communications protocols of drones better be flexible enough for frequent software updates, as I suspect that this sort of drone-killer concept will be a continuous cat and mouse game, just as jail breaking phones is. New drone-killing device released, tomorrow a drone with “anti-kill” technology built-in where the hole is plugged.
WatchmnDave
“It was developed by researchers at Battelle, a nonprofit research and development outfit”…
If you say Non-Profit it makes the general public think that their government didn’t use tax payer dollars to defeat another liberty of their… :)
TonyG
Why hasn’t Congress passed a law requiring a backdoor for security forces to take control over a drone yet? They have for everything else!
Neil Colvin
That’s pretty interesting. I see this a good starting point. Drones non-military fly up to about 14 minutes and then need a battery change. That means someone has to see the drone in the first place and then someone has to notify dispatch and send a patrol out to stun it. That’s a short window to work with depending on the size of the area to cover. Battelle is probably already working on it but I’d like to see a passive system attached to a fence line or structure. Since it “hacks” the drone with a code, it probably wouldn’t interfere with other things like small aircraft or communication devices. Now there is no response needed because the drones simply cannot fly into your airspace. Still, I like where this is going.
Andrew Miller
Its a very interesting take on the idea of taking down drones, but like everyone said what if it is used on planes and communication devices, what now?