Skip to content
France orders Google to scrub search globally in right to be forgotten requests
Naked Security Naked Security

France orders Google to scrub search globally in right to be forgotten requests

We do not care if a URL's got a .fr, a .uk or a .com glued to the end, France told Google - if a European makes a legitimate request to be forgotten in search results, make it so on all your search engines in all countries.

France orders Google to scrub search globally in right to be forgotten requestsWe do not care if a URL’s got a .fr, a .uk or a .com glued to the end, the French data protection agency told Google on Friday – if a European makes a legitimate request to be forgotten in search results, make it so on all your search engines in all countries.

A recap: An EU court decreed in May 2014 that people have the right to be forgotten online.

Google dutifully, unenthusiastically put up a form to let people request delisting in search results, but within weeks it got into trouble due to its rather picky approach, which consisted of burying search results for its subsidiary in a given country, as opposed to on worldwide search results.

A Canadian court, for one, ruled in June 2014 that Google had to bury search results for a Canadian company’s competitor, not just in Canada but around the world.

France has previously been on Google’s case about this issue.

In the autumn of 2014, a French court convicted Google over the same thing: i.e., failing to comply with a right to be forgotten case after it took down links on its French subsidiary but failed to do so globally.

Now, France’s Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés (CNIL), the country’s data protection authority, has ordered Google to apply delisting on all domain names of its search engine.

CNIL said in its news release that it’s received hundreds of complaints following Google’s refusals to carry out delisting.

According to its latest transparency report, last updated on Friday 12 June, Google had received a total of 269,314 removal requests, had evaluated 977,948 URLs, and had removed 41.3% of those URLs.

CNIL sized up the complaints it’s received from those whom Google had declined to forget and says that it requested that Google delist several results – not just based on the extension on the URL, it said, but on all results from the whole search engine.

From the release:

Although the company has granted some of the requests, delisting was only carried out on European extensions of the search engine and not when searches are made from "" or other non-European extensions.

In accordance with the [Court of Justice of the European Union] judgement, the CNIL considers that in order to be effective, delisting must be carried out on all extensions of the search engine and that the service provided by Google search constitutes a single processing.

Google was given 15 days to shape up, and the CNIL said it made the formal notice public to give other search engines and internet content providers a heads-up about the issue.

According to the BBC, Google had this to say in a statement:

We've been working hard to strike the right balance in implementing the European Court's ruling, co-operating closely with data protection authorities.

The ruling focused on services directed to European users, and that's the approach we are taking in complying with it.

The CNIL’s order doesn’t entail a sanction. Rather, it’s a pre-sanction.

If Google doesn’t comply, then the machinery to get a sanction recommended will be put into motion.

Image of Google courtesy of Liang Zou / .


That is some pretty…creative language google is using in their statement. Basically implying that because it is a European ruling they don’t need to implement changes in searches worldwide. Almost blaming the court. I really don’t see why their reluctance here. (Also you gotta love it when these behemoths use vague terms Iike “strike the right balance”)


I used to use Google as a part of background checks for applicants to our social club. Weeded out some shady folks that way. (Also did criminal records check, sex offender lists, etc.)

Looks like people no longer want to be held accountable. If I go back to doing these checks, looks like I need to use a different provider.


I am truly getting sick of over-privileged countries trying to impose their laws on the rest of the world. This was a EUROPEAN court decision. Not a WORLDWIDE decision. European courts have no jurisdiction outside of Europe.
And one could further argue that as a US company, they’re not subject to Europe’s stupid rulings anyway.


Over-privileged countries? You have got to be kidding me. Obviously written by some privileged libertarian Google Fan-Boy. There are very valid reasons for Europeans to be concerned about privacy. Everybody should be concerned about it.


We all have valid reasons to be concerned about privacy, but what right does France have to dictate the terms of such to the rest of the world?


Google is a US-based multinational, not simply a US company. They have assets and employees in the Europe, and are therefore to at least some extent subject to European laws.


Censoring search results because an individual/company does not like them sets a really bad precedence. I hope Google keeps fighting for our rights to search for freely available public information.


Russia is also passing a Right To Be Forgotten law. So, combining these two, we’ll soon force Google to turn off any links that Russia doesn’t like. World-wide. Probably many other countries will follow suit.

You either have freedom of speech or you don’t. France says that Google must bow to any country which doesn’t like what Google has to say. I do not support this, and I don’t know why so many do.


when this law first came in is when I switched all my default search providers to (with the added benefits of them not tracking or logging my search data for the NSA)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to get the latest updates in your inbox.
Which categories are you interested in?
You’re now subscribed!