Some of us may think that an appropriate penalty for robocallers is to stuff them with burner phones and roast them up for Sunday dinner, in which case some of us are going to be underwhelmed with the news that the FCC has basically slapped some hands and tsk-tsk-ed them into promising to never, ever do it again.
On Tuesday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it’s shut down four operations responsible for billions of unwanted calls, some of which had tossed some particularly loathsome fraud into the mix.
One of the shyster scams was Veterans of America, aka Vehicles for Veterans LLC, aka Saving Our Soldiers, aka Donate Your Car, aka Donate That Car LLC, aka Act of Valor, aka Medal of Honor.
Red, white and blue-painted bilge
That’s a lot of names for a load of flag-waving fraud. The operator of the fake charity, Travis Deloy Peterson, allegedly sent millions of robocalls to donors and collected money and property – automobiles, watercraft, real estate, and timeshares – illegally, claiming the donations were going to veterans’ charities (they weren’t) and that they were tax-deductible (nope).
The FTC stresses that lots of charities are doing good work supporting veterans. Then there are those who pretend to be charities, squeeze victims’ hearts, and line their pockets with whatever they can get. Here’s a video the FTC put together, about how to avoid getting scammed by a “donate your car! … it’s for a VETERAN!” bottomfeeder:
So how, exactly, did the FTC shut down this operator? By getting him to promise not to do it anymore. From its release:
The FTC stopped him in his tracks, and now he can’t send or help others send robocalls anymore.
Why not fine their robo-ears off?
Devin Coldewey over at TechCrunch was struck by the surprisingly paltry fines – or none at all, in three out of the four cases – handed out to this handful of robocallers. Besides Veterans of America, the FTC shut down these three other operations:
Point Break Media. These guys allegedly specialized in screwing small businesses by pretending to be associated with Google and threatening to delist their victim companies from Google search results unless they paid up.
In exchange for fees that started between $300 and $700 (for purportedly “claiming and verifying” their Google listing, lest they get marked as “permanently closed” by Google) and went up to one-time fees of $949.99 and recurring monthly payments of $169.99 or $99.99, those small businesses most certainly did not get Top! Ranking! in Google search, according to FTC allegations.
According to the FTC, the Point Break defendants had no relationship whatsoever with Google. Three defendants in the case against the operator agreed to a robocall ban, and a ban on helping others send robocalls.
There was no fine assessed.
Higher Goals Marketing. In this one, seven defendants agreed to swear off telemarketing for good. Some of them were recidivists: they operated a credit card debt-relief scheme, which they started just weeks after the FTC closed a similar operation in the Life Management Services case. Several of the defendants had previously worked there, the FTC said.
In the Life Management Services case, there had actually been a serious fine: the FTC’s order imposed a non-suspended judgment of $23,099,878 against Kevin W. Guice, for restitution to the consumers he bilked. He also was forced to give up his 55-foot yacht and his luxury watch collection.
Finally, the one case announced on Tuesday that entailed a fine:
NetDotSolutions. The FTC considers this a double win. Not only did three of the defendants provide autodialers used to place billions of illegal robocalls, but they also allegedly supplied the autodialing technology used by robocallers in at least eight prior FTC cases.
They allegedly pitched everything from auto warranties to home security systems and supposed debt-relief services, the FTC alleged, placing billions of calls to pester people, regardless of whether their phone numbers were on the National Do Not Call (DNC) Registry.
They got through by illegally spoofing caller IDs to make it look like the calls were coming from neighbors, as in, people calling from the same area code as that of the victims.
The three defendants have been banned from supplying autodialers to telemarketers. They’ll also be paying a fine of $1.35 million.
You can’t get what isn’t there
Here’s the thing, TechCrunch says: even though the fines (when there were any) look big, as in, millions of dollars, they don’t amount to bupkus. Here’s Coldewey:
Although the cases resulted in judgments totaling some 24 million dollars, the actual amount the scammers will end up paying will end up closer to $3-4 million. One scammer whose judgments totaled more than $5 million will be suspended when he pays just $18,332 – and whatever comes from the sale of his shiny new Mercedes.
Why the meager fines imposed on incorrigible robocallers? …as in, the scofflaws who blithely aggravate and scam people, unhampered by the telephone service providers – those who Federal Communications Chairman (FCC) Ajit Pai has fumed at for their lousy efforts on blocking robocalls?
Coldewey called the FTC about it. A spokesperson told him that the judgment amounts in these cases are a ceiling defined by how much consumer harm was done. You can put as many zeros on those amounts as you want, but if the defendants don’t have it, you aren’t going to get it.
But why don’t the kingpins have money, given the lucrative scams they allegedly pull off? It has to do with an interesting twist in the money game.
Have you ever noticed that many of these robocalling kingpins are located in Florida? As the FTC tells it, the state’s Homestead rule protects their houses from being seized in these proceedings.
Court cases can drag on for years, leaving the robocallers free to keep plaguing people and innovating the technology to do so. Hence, the FTC takes the quicker path to keeping them away from harming consumers even more: namely, these agreements to drop out of the business.
Perhaps Floridians might have alternative solutions to the burgeoning robocall hell we currently live in. Perhaps, say, trained alligators?
Joe
Last I checked, fraud was a crime. How about some serious prison time for these slime?
anonymous coward
FTC is a bureaucratic entity, as is FCC. It’s largely toothless. It can bring forth a lawsuit for payment of fines in violations of regulations, but can’t seek damages or criminally prosecute.
If there were actual evidence of criminal activity, these cases would’ve been referred to DOJ for criminal prosecution. If there were actual evidence of serious consumer harm, FTC would coordinate and assist civil litigation plaintiffs and attorneys in seeking damages. They did neither.
This is just bogus regulations enforcement, fine collection, and press releases for the purpose of promoting career bureaucracy. The money they collect will go towards coffee supplies and new swivel chairs, not crime victims.
Mahhn
The FTC should be locked up with the scammers for 20 years, since they are supporting the activity by not locking them up..
At least they have been named. Travis Deloy Peterson should get some real veterans visiting him.
Rhonda Caywood
How about Florida changing some laws? And what does that have to do with court cases dragging on for years; are you referring to Florida only or other locations as well? And why are court cases dragging on for years? Because they’re just Robocallers and the FTC doesn’t want to invest their time and money in pursuing these crooks. Personally, I have stopped answering my phone all together. I figure if it is someone who is NOT a scammer, they will leave a message, the only messages I receive lately are from the scammers themselves! That’s a helluva way to live a life. I always considered my phone my private space, but that was back in the olden days.
Spryte
Gotta hit them where it hurts, the wallet!!
Bryan
> an appropriate penalty for robocallers is to stuff them with burner phones and roast them up for Sunday dinner
It’s impressive how in a couple dozen paragraphs I can traverse the line between “yikes, that sounds a bit harsh” all the way to “nope; too lenient–turn it up a notch.”
There are some seriously annoying legal loopholes out there, but as long as a *legitimate* business aims to use it–knock yourself out.
If you’re moving to another state for a legal loophole knowing that your “business” model will inexorably put you in federal court with a high likelihood of losing assets, then come over here first–got something to show you.
I’ll give you a hint:
Grandpa used to ask me, “you ever see the stars in my sleeve?“
Frazier Sheffer
Jon Oliver did a segment on his show “Last Week Tonight” (HBO) and exposed the private phone numbers of the five FCC panel members. No doubt they received a flood of calls from irate consumers.
Perhaps this had something to do with the FCC’s sudden interest in doing something?
anonymous coward
This has nothing to do with the FCC. This was an FTC action, started long ago. Oliver did nothing to affect these cases, except put himself in jeopardy for illegal information disclosures.
Anonymous
It’s obvious that we have to thank John Oliver for this progress.
anonymous coward
No.
Anon
Did the the Life Management Services case judgment of $23,099,878, 55-foot yacht and his luxury-watch collection proceeds go to the victims of the scam or did the govt just pocket the proceeds for themselves?
anonymous coward
Agencies are supposed to turn over excess “income” (fines) to the US general fund, but they’re allowed to subtract “expenses.” These include training events, replacement chairs, coffee, *good* toilet paper, clothing allowances, and other nonsense that isn’t in the regular budget.